Series · From the Omer to ShavuosKodashim › Menachos › Perek 10 › Mishnah 2קָדָשִׁים ‹ מנחות ‹ פרק י׳ ‹ משנה ב׳
Movement I·B · The Grain — Origin, Quality, and Public Funding

The Nearest Fields

8 · מְנָחוֹת י:ב · Menachos 10:2
מִצְוַת הָעֹמֶר לָבֹא מִן הַקָּרוֹב. לֹא בִכֵּר הַקָּרוֹב לִירוּשָׁלַיִם — מְבִיאִים אוֹתוֹ מִכָּל מָקוֹם. מַעֲשֶׂה שֶׁבָּא מִגַּגּוֹת צְרִיפִין, וּשְׁתֵּי הַלֶּחֶם מִבִּקְעַת עֵין סוֹכֵר.
The mitzva of the Omer is to come from nearby [fields proximate to Jerusalem]. If the nearby crop did not ripen — bring it from anywhere [in EY]. It once happened that the Omer came from Gaggot Tzrifin, and the two loaves from the valley of Ein Sokher.
Fuchsia — Rule
Green — Positive ruling
Purple — Condition
Black — Case
Go deeperOpen what helps. Nothing here is needed to learn the Mishnah.
The rule and its fallback
The rule — proximity preferred
מִצְוַת הָעֹמֶר לָבֹא מִן הַקָּרוֹב
From the nearest qualifying barley fields to Jerusalem. The principle: ein ma'avirin al hamitzvos — one should not pass over an opportunity to perform a mitzva. Take the first qualifying grain you encounter approaching the city.
The fallback — anywhere in EY
לֹא בִכֵּר הַקָּרוֹב
מְבִיאִים מִכָּל מָקוֹם
If the nearby fields did not ripen in time — bring from anywhere in EY. The EY-source requirement (mishnah 6) still applies; only the proximity preference is set aside.
The historical incident — when "nearby" became impossible
Emergency procurement — both Korbanos came from afar in the same period
גַּגּוֹת צְרִיפִין
~40km
Gaggot Tzrifin (Sarafand, near modern Lod) — for the Omer. Identified by the Mishnat Eretz Yisrael as Sarafend el-Kharab. Roman military activity had destroyed the grain fields surrounding Jerusalem, forcing the court to travel this distance for barley.
בִּקְעַת עֵין סוֹכֵר
~60km
Valley of Ein Sokher (near Shechem/Nablus) — for the Shtei HaLechem. Even further north. Both Korbanos facing the same logistical crisis in the same period of Roman disruption — bound together not just legally but historically.
What the historical incident reveals
The Omer and the Shtei HaLechem were not merely legal parallels — they shared the same wartime reality. When Roman forces destroyed the Jerusalem-area grain fields, both Korbanos were affected simultaneously. The halacha required each from the nearest available source; crisis required both from far away. The two Korbanos are bound together in historical hardship, not just in legal theory.
Position in the Omer to Shavuos arc — 43 mishnayos
Preceding · Mishnah 7
Keilim 1:6
EY's holiness defined by the Omer, Bikkurim, and Shtei HaLechem
Current · Mishnah 8
Menachos 10:2 — The Nearest Fields
Movement I·B
EY is established as the required source (mishnah 6); now the preference within EY: the nearest fields to Jerusalem. The Gaggot Tzrifin incident shows what happens when that preference is impossible — and reveals that the Omer and Shtei HaLechem faced identical challenges in the same historical moment.
Following · Mishnah 9
Shekalim 4:1
Who pays for all of this? The public funding mechanism
The Lived MishnahHome
‹PreviousKeilim 1:6›NextIntro to Shekalim 4:1
וּסְפַרְתֶּם לָכֶם
A siyum · From the Omer to Shavuos

You have learned every Mishnah of From the Omer to Shavuos — all 53 steps.

Back to the series